Digital court reporting refers to using technology to create an electronic record of court proceedings. In traditional court reporting, stenographers use shorthand and specialized machines to transcribe spoken words into written text. Digital court reporting, on the other hand, involves using digital audio recording equipment and computer software to capture and transcribe court proceedings.

Here are some key aspects of digital court reporting:

  1. Audio Recording: Digital court reporters use audio recording equipment to capture all spoken words during court proceedings. This could include the judge, attorneys, witnesses, and other parties involved.
  2. Voice Recognition Software: Once the audio is recorded, voice recognition software is often employed to automatically transcribe spoken words into text. This software can be trained to recognize specific voices and legal terminology.
  3. Editing and Annotation: Digital court reporters can edit and annotate transcripts easily using specialized software. This allows them to correct errors in the automated transcription and add relevant annotations or comments.
  4. Real-Time Transcription: Some digital court reporters can provide real-time transcription services. This means the transcribed text is available almost immediately during the court proceedings. This can benefit attorneys, judges, and other participants who need quick access to the record.
  5. Search and Retrieval: Digital transcripts can be stored electronically, making it easier to search, retrieve, and organize information. This can save time and resources compared to traditional paper transcripts.
  6. Remote Access: Digital court reporting can facilitate remote access to court proceedings. With the use of video conferencing technology, reporters and other participants can connect remotely and still have access to real-time transcripts.

Digital court reporting is an alternative to traditional court reporting. It’s important to note that the acceptance and adoption of digital court reporting may vary among jurisdictions, and some courts still rely on traditional stenographic or voice methods or a combination of both.